Official Partner of the NCAA®
    
powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Playoffs don't seem to be reality at BCS meetings - NCAA Football Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
College Football Home | Scoreboard | Standings | Schedules | Stats | Teams | Players | Polls | Video
 

Playoffs don't seem to be reality at BCS meetings

 

HOLLYWOOD, Fla. – Sorry playoff supporters, it seems that you'll have to wait a little longer.

Advertisement  
 

While official word probably won't come until Wednesday at the earliest, the BCS structure looks like it is going to remain the same. Amid speculation that a modest plus-one playoff might be considered here, BCS chairman John Swofford didn't sound like a man ready to participate in ripping apart the college football landscape.

"I continue to sense a certain comfort level, if you will, with the current status of things with the BCS," Swofford said Monday at the conclusion of the first day of the annual BCS meetings.

The real nitty gritty will come Wednesday morning when SEC commissioner Mike Slive intends to put forward his version of the plus-one. In his model, the top four teams in the BCS standings would be seeded and play 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 in two national semifinals. The national championship game would be held one to two weeks later.

It's hard, though, to find overwhelming support here for such a plan. Pac-10 commissioner Tom Hansen and Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany are adamantly opposed to a plus-one.

"The BCS is not a democracy where majority rules, it's a full consensus body," said Swofford who is also the ACC commissioner.

Any real change probably won't occur until after the 2013 season when television contracts of the four BCS bowls line up. The Rose Bowl contract with ABC expires after the January 2014 game. The Fiesta, Sugar and Orange deals expire after the 2009 season (2010 bowls). Fox is expected to extend the deal for the three bowls in the fall.

The 10-year-old BCS has had its share of flaws but seems to be settling into a rhythm if the commissioners fail to act on a plus-one. Swofford announced Monday that the three-year-old Harris Poll will be retained for another two years. The Harris Poll was created after the Associated Press decided to remove its media poll from the process. The Harris is made of up of former players, administrators and media members. The six computer indexes will be retained for 2008 as well. The BCS gives one-third weight each to the Harris Poll, coaches' poll and the computers. Tuesday will be spent in meetings with television partners (ABC and Fox). Fox Sports president Ed Goren is expected to meet with the group at approximately 2 p.m. ET. That could be when we hear how strident Fox is about changing the current BCS structure.

Goren was quoted last week as saying that three years ago he was one of those favoring a new format.

"But I've either been brainwashed, or educated, to another side to this story," he told the Chicago Tribune.

Delany said, somewhat sarcastically, that a 16-team playoff could easily be set up. It would require eliminating conference championship games and reducing the regular season to 11 games, he said. The problem, as Delany knows, that such a format would be rejected out of hand by the commissioners.

There is problem enough with a plus-one. Under Slive's model, another BCS bowl would have to be added. The Chick-Fil-A and Cotton are intensely interested in becoming that new bowl if the discussion ever gets that far. It probably won't here.

"I don't think we really need to go there at this point (adding another bowl)," Swofford said. "It's a little premature for me as chair of the group ... We have two more days of meetings to go."

 
Talk Back
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 22, 2006

April 29, 2008 4:46 pm
The current BCS doesn't do what it was designed to do.  It does not crown a true undisputed champion.  There is too much politics in selecting the title game.  The four best teams at the close of the regular season last year were USC, Ohio State, Kansas and Georgia yet we saw LSU and OSU in the title.  Now I can see how KU was left out, but that doesn't mean it was right.& ...(more)
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 16, 2007

April 28, 2008 10:05 pm
I'm not sure how this playoff system would work, but i would love if it was similar to ncaa basketball's brackets. college football is much more watched than basketball, however the bowl games do not attract as many viewers than march madness does. maybe the national championship is the exception, but there is so much more potential in a bracket-like structure
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jun 28, 2007

April 29, 2008 2:28 pm
This is obviously Dennis Dodd's fault. And why is he reporting this? It isn't news. He's just spreading gossip and riling up the masses.  He's an idiot and the worst sportswriter in the world.

Well... I don't actually think any of these things, but I just don't know how to deal with a Sportsline message board that doesn't have like 500 mean and abusive comments
...(more)
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 17, 2006

April 29, 2008 12:18 pm
Same old retread response out of Swofford and the BS - errr BCS meetings. “A playoff system would be nice, but we just can’t do it now! TV contracts don’t align, school administrators don’t want one, a playoff system could redistribute wealth – strike that – I was supposed to think, not say that!”  It’s all rhetoric! The money monge ...(more)
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 2, 2007

April 28, 2008 7:45 pm
I am not a big lover for a full blown playoff system but I was a fan of the plus one model and now this looks like it wont happen... really disappointed, the BCS I think has been good for college football so far but it does need a little tweak and to me that was the 4 team playoff model... I wonder why these guys dont see it as a good thing... it would only create more money for College Football?? ...(more)
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 7, 2006

April 28, 2008 9:42 pm

Go vote in round two of the Greatest Sports Rivalries Bracket now!

Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 29, 2006

April 28, 2008 10:54 pm

If the BCS does adopt a plus 1 game, come January 1st, I'll still roll out of bed with a slight hang over from celebrating New Year's Eve, Turn on the boob tube and watch the Tournament of Rose's parade, and then later watch the Rose Bowl.  Nothing is going to change.  Personally, I really don't care who plays in it just as long as just one team is from the Pac-10 ...(more)

Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 5, 2006