powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
Belichick's legacy rests on 'if' Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Contests
 Fantasy FB Today
 Fantasy News
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 Football Scoreboard
 Football Rankings
 Football Passing Leaders
Football Rushing Leaders
Football Highlights
Volleyball Rankings
MaxPreps High School Sports
MaxPreps TV Schedule
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Columns Home | Alerts | Community
 

Belichick's legacy rests on 'if'

 
« Back · 1 · 2

If Belichick is guilty of stealing signs, he pumped up his athletic arsenal just as surely -- and just as illegally -- as Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire and Rafael Palmeiro allegedly pumped up theirs. If you want to be extremely cynical, consider this: Belichick went from a 36-44 coach who was fired by Cleveland in 1995 to the most successful four-year run in NFL history with the Patriots.

Advertisement  
 

How'd he do that?

That's why the potential penalties being bandied about -- the Patriots losing a draft pick, getting fined, or both -- are way too weak. When an NFL player is caught using a performance enhancing substance, like Shawne Merriman a year ago, the penalty is a four-game suspension. Then eight games. Then a year.

It should be the same for a coach. If Belichick is guilty, he must miss four games -- at least. And for every game he misses, he must miss practices as well. Merriman couldn't practice with the Chargers during his four-game NFL suspension, so why should a coach be able to attend practice during his? Don't allow Belichick into the Patriots' football complex. Don't allow him to have any contact with New England players, coaches or front-office personnel -- or any intermediaries, either.

Knowledge is a coach's weapon, and if he's suspended, he must keep that weapon to himself.

That would be a severe punishment, but if the reports are true, Belichick and the Patriots have a lot more to worry about than four games, eight games or even a season. They have to worry about the taint of scandal, about how long this trickery has gone on, and about how they will be judged not only by the NFL, but by history.

In this area, the steroid analogy no longer works. Major League Baseball isn't about to vacate any of Rafael Palmeiro's accomplishments, for example.

Despite his positive test for steroids, Palmeiro gets to keep his 569 career home runs. He might not get into the Hall of Fame, but that's going forward. Going backward? There is no going backward for Palmeiro. What's done is done, but everything he accomplished is his forever.

That's why an NCAA parallel is more applicable here. Belichick and the Patriots are being investigated for outright cheating, and when a cheater gets caught in college, titles are often vacated.

Look at the Official 2007 NCAA Men's Final Four Records Book. Go to page 8, where Final Four participants are listed. There are asterisks next to runners-up Villanova in 1971 and UCLA in '80, and next to third-place teams Massachusetts in '96 and Minnesota in '97. At the bottom of the page, it notes that an asterisk means "later vacated."

Those teams cheated. History is harsh

Should that happen to the Patriots' Super Bowl titles of 2001, '03 and '04? Absolutely -- if the NFL proves they were stealing signs in those games.

Given the nationwide popularity of the NFL and the worldwide importance of the Super Bowl, have we just encountered the biggest if in sports history?

« Back · 1 · 2
 
 
 
 
 
Gregg Doyel
Recent Columns
 
Headlines