powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Walsh made everybody look dumb with one big bluff Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Columns Home | Alerts | Community
 

Walsh made everybody look dumb with one big bluff

 

I'm going to guess Matt Walsh plays an excellent game of poker.

For weeks we expected Walsh, the former New England Patriots videographer/rat to produce some sort of blockbuster material. Videotapes of a Super Bowl walkthrough. Massive new evidence of cheating. Pictures of Roger Clemens and a country western singer. Ozzie Guillen with a blowup doll. Something.

Could Bill Belichick have handled the episode better? Yes, but same goes for the NFL, media and fans. (AP)  
Could Bill Belichick have handled the episode better? Yes, but same goes for the NFL, media and fans. (AP)  
What did Walsh produce?

Basically, nothing.

Garbage.

The NFL acknowledged receiving details about Walsh's eight videotapes, which show more of the same stuff. Bill Belichick taped signals of opposing teams. We knew that already. Thanks, dude.

"This is consistent with what the Patriots had admitted they had been doing, consistent with what we already knew," league spokesman Greg Aiello told the Associated Press.

Walsh pulled the greatest bluff in sports history.

And you know what? The league knew Walsh was bluffing all along. Initially, I believed the opposite. I thought the overly protracted negotiations between the NFL and Walsh were the two entities simply trying to out-douche one another.

It turns out the NFL was outsmarting Walsh and many of us as well. The league knew he had large caches of nothing. This explains why the NFL went through this dog and pony show of negotiations with Walsh. Those talks would in the end make the league look like it completed a thorough negotiation with Walsh and thus the NFL embarked on a complete search for the truth.

This is what will happen next: When Walsh and Roger Goodell meet next week, Walsh will tell the NFL what it already knew. Goodell will call a press conference, blast Walsh as a bluffing jackass and declare the matter over.

And it will be over. The issue will be deader than Richard Nixon.

Spygate will officially die next week.

Let's be clear. This column isn't tacit approval of what Belichick did. He was wrong and his attitude about the whole thing was wrong.

This is, however, disapproval of how everyone has handled Spygate, including Walsh, the NFL, the media and fans.

The media: Because some of us used this situation to go after Belichick because we don't like him personally.

The fans: Ditto.

The NFL: Because their negotiations with Walsh should have ended months ago.

Poll
What is your take on the latest Spygate news?
  43% Let it go already
 
 
  45% Throw the book at the Pats
 
 
  12% Hear what Matt Walsh has to say
 
 
 
Total Votes: 20686

Walsh made one of the bigger mistakes by refusing to clarify the most important portion of this story. When the Boston Herald reported that a Super Bowl walkthrough was recorded by the Patriots, Walsh could have issued a statement through his lawyer, saying he did have incriminating tapes but they weren't of any walkthrough.

But Walsh didn't. He let that apparently erroneous fact marinate in the media for months. And marinate it did -- exploding into one of the more compelling sports stories in decades.

Then when it was time to turn over the tapes, Walsh's lawyer states: We don't know nothin' 'bout no stinking walkthroughs.

Walsh didn't do this by accident. I think, for whatever reason, he wanted Belichick and his old team to suffer.

(By the way, the last thing we need to hear is Chris Mortensen admonishing the Herald. Mort is a solid journalist and a good guy but he should know better. Every journalist has made at least one significant reporting mistake -- including Mort.)

The potential of the Patriots taping a Super Bowl walkthrough was the polonium, the nuclear trigger, for this entire story. It was the most compelling allegation and Walsh knew, or should have known, it was false. He or his attorney should have immediately corrected the record.

What I'm most curious about is Walsh. At some point, he'll sit down and do a Barbara Walters, Oprah or Bryant Gumbel confessional interview. I want to know his motivation for holding onto these tapes for all these years.

I don't buy the Patriots' explanation that Walsh is a bitter ex-employee. Walsh's reasons are more complex. I won't analyze from afar. Besides, I have used up all of my energy trying to figure Doyel out.

Like it or not, Spygate is dead.

Not sure what you Hatriots are going to do now.

 
Talk Back
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 30, 2006

May 9, 2008 12:16 pm
Calling people names, Hatriots, isn't making a case to those who watched in disgust as the details of the coach's and staff's documented rules violations. Grace may come in time, but validation won't be granted when the playing field was skewed. While the degree of advantage will be debated forever, what is undeniable is that they took what those honoring the rules would not. As far as I'm concern ...(more)
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 27, 2007

May 10, 2008 2:06 pm
If anyone thinks that there is no tape, you are nuts.  Walsh played this perfectly.  He had tapes of the walkthrough, he probably was approached by someone "representing" the Patriots, given a large sum of cash for said tapes, and is now being villified.  The Patriots cheated, end of story.
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 18, 2007

May 17, 2008 8:12 pm

I have read many of the threads from many different people who see very upset on some of the things the Patriots might have done.

I have found one thing that is consistent between all of them. That is you will not find two people who have the same point of view.

1. There is a walk thru tape. (everyone agrees it does not exist)

2. They cheated by using tapes of signals ...(more)

Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 18, 2007

May 17, 2008 7:53 pm
Are the people citicizing this article the same people that had the Duke Lacross players hanging by thier throats before they were tried. All this because of a media feeding frenzy on a scandel that ESPN and the general media wanted. This is not about the Pats cheating. This is about jealousy, and envy. As we all know, this brings out the worst in people. (note:) Does anyone think those ...(more)
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 19, 2006

May 15, 2008 3:41 pm

     What Walsh provided was tangible, viewable evidence that hadnt been destroyed by the commish.  Also, it showed the Patriots trying to gain info on OFFENSIVE play calls and tendencies as well.  No, he did not produce a tape of the walkthrough for the Rams SB, but he did WATCH the practice, annote the report with formations, tendencies, and the plays.....cmon no ...(more)

Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Oct 29, 2006

May 9, 2008 2:15 pm