powered by Google  
CBSSports.com California Senate rejects idea of selling L.A. Coliseum, Sports Arena Sports News   Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Contests
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
 

California Senate rejects idea of selling L.A. Coliseum, Sports Arena

 

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- The state Senate rejected legislation Thursday that would require the state to sell the site of the historic Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum and adjoining Los Angeles Sports Arena.

Advertisement  
 

The bill's author, Sen. Jeff Denham, R-Merced, said the stadium is "falling apart" and that selling the land would generate as much as $400 million to help ease the state's budget crunch.

California is facing a $15.2 billion deficit in the fiscal year that starts July 1.

"All I'm asking right now is that we take a look at this property as well as many other properties in the state and evaluate whether they're surplus and whether they bring in good tax revenue," Denham said.

The state owns the land on which the 85-year-old coliseum and 48-year-old arena sit, said Pat Lynch, general manager of the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission, which manages the two facilities under a 49-year lease with the state.

Denham's office said the state also owns a third of both structures, with Los Angeles County and the city of Los Angeles owning the rest. Lynch, however, said the state owns only the land.

Opponents said the bill would undercut efforts to improve Exposition Park, which is owned by the state and houses the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the California Science Center and the California African American Museum, in addition to the coliseum and sports arena.

"This measure doesn't do service to the overall objectives we seek to happen in Exposition Park," said Sen. Mark Ridley-Thomas, a Los Angeles Democrat who represents the area.

"The Science Center, the California African American Museum are all state-owned assets the state benefits from. Sale of this particular property doesn't fit the master plan for that park."

Ridley-Thomas also said selling the property would not help bring an NFL franchise back to the coliseum, the former home of the Raiders, now in Oakland, and Rams, now in St. Louis.

"That ship has sailed," Ridley-Thomas said.

Another opponent, Sen. Gil Cedillo, D-Los Angeles, questioned whether a sale was even legally possible "given the historic nature of the coliseum."

The coliseum was designated a national historic landmark in 1984, the day before it the start of the Summer Olympics. It also was the site of the 1932 games and the home of the Los Angeles Dodgers from 1958 to 1961.

CONTINUED: 1 · 2 · Next »
AP NEWS
The Associated Press News Service

Copyright 2007-2008, The Associated Press, All Rights Reserved
 
Talk Back
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jun 28, 2007

May 19, 2008 5:49 pm
So, the State clearly owns the land, but apparently there's a dispute about who owns the stadium. Seems to me that the cost of that litigation alone (i.e., over whether or not the state owns 1/3 of the stadium), is enough to make selling it not worthwhile.
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Mar 14, 2007

May 16, 2008 11:16 pm
I'm all for it. The government already owns too much land, bought with our money.
Reputation:91
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 17, 2007

May 16, 2008 1:59 pm
this to me is funny seeing how there has been so much talk about an nfl team try'in to move to the LA area. NOW they are try'in to sell off  these great places so the state can make a buck phhh!
Reputation:28
Level:Rookie
Since:Feb 21, 2008

May 17, 2008 9:22 pm
(POLL) should L.A. seal it or not??
 
 
 
 
Headlines