Uh... Really?

The only ones who will respond to Parrish with disagreement are those who think he might, just might, be trying to say UNC had a greater possibility to lose a game without this advantage.  After the WSU game, I am inclined to believe UNC can adapt to any situation, any circumstance, and it wouldn't make a hill of beans difference where they played.  They will win the National Championship.  The Cards will be their most difficult opponent, however.

Why doesn't Gary mention that almost every team has a higher tournament winning percentage in their home state. You know why that is? Teams normally play the first two rounds in their home state and later rounds elsewhere. UNC plays its first two games in the state of North Carolina almost every year. Those are games that they should win. Of course there is some level of home court advantage. Just not the level Gary suggests.

Roy denies the advantage not because he believes none exists, but because he does not want his team to get complacent in any way. His message is to his players that they need to win the game on the court.

Why doesn't Gary mention that almost every team has a higher tournament winning percentage in their home state. You know why that is? Teams normally play the first two rounds in their home state and later rounds elsewhere. UNC plays its first two games in the state of North Carolina almost every year. Those are games that they should win. Of course there is some level of home court advantage.

You're exactly right!

Two things. One, If Gary would check North Carolina's and Duke's tourney record in the Meadowlands I believe he'd find it's very good there too because they've both played the early round games there.

Two, does anyone remember reading a Whisky fan's post two days ago about Davidson playing in the friendly confines of North Carolina and how it was going to be different in Detroit?

The advantage is undeniable.  The simple fact of the matter is that once the first round is over no team should be in a bracket where they can continue to play in front of hometown fans with ease.  The location of games in the tourney is huge, homecourt advantage is huge.  I say we move the tournament to Canada where there is no chance of home court advantage.

Seriously the UNC fans cannot say that they think it is not an advantage.  UNC deserves no special treatment.  If any one deserved to play in their home state most of the way it was Memphis...they only lost one game....in their homestate of all places.

The advantage is undeniable...remember the '88 Fianl Four in Kansas City?  There was no way KU could have won it all that year playing anywhere else but KC.  That is a fact.

UNC WILL NOT WIN THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP.  Sorry to burst your bubble here fellas but they simple do not have the arsenal to get through the next two games.  U of L is tough and athletic and deep.  Even if UNC manages to get through the Cards there is a buzzsaw waiting for them in Kansas...should they get blessed by the almighty to win that I don't see them beating Texas or Memphis or UCLA.  It was a nice season for UNC, hell next to KU I like them most simply because of Roy Williams.  They just have a hard road to hoe...hell all the teams do now.

The advantage is undeniable...remember the '88 Fianl Four in Kansas City?  There was no way KU could have won it all that year playing anywhere else but KC.  That is a fact.

Wow!  Is that really a fact.  What you are saying is that you have indisputable evidence that shows without a doubt that KU would have lossed if they were not playing at home.  I would like to see this evidence.  I am giving you a homework assignment ft rommel.  You have from now until UNC runs Kansas over in the final 4 to produce this evidence.  That gives you one week to do whatever research is needed.  Get to work.