Adam Archuleta anyone?

Terrible idea.  I don't care if he'd play for Skittles and beer, I don't want him on my team.  He can't compete in the NFL, is slow (physically and mentally).  I am aware that he could provide leadership, but a player won't accept an "incentive-based" contract based on playing time when he'd be relegated to a back-up role.

Jones and Pool are the unquestioned starters and we've got Sorenson and Adams behind them.  He'd be, at best, second on the depth chart, but probably third.

I was thinking the same thing you are at about this time last year as well.  I thought that Adam Archuleta was going to be a big part of the Bears defense and go back to being his old self especially because he was back with his former coach Lovie Smith.  That was not the case.  He was slow, couldn't make some of the tackels that he was expected to make, and didn't seem like he was doing anything to help the Bears.  He's lost too much to play in the NFL again.  A mentor would be the only positives to get out of him but even at that it's not like he was ever a consistently good player.  He had 3 good seasons with the Rams while they were a good team.  Being on a good team and producing for that good team makes him look better then he is.  I wouldnt take a chance on him if I was the Browns.