NCAA bids irk ACC coaches

Is Greenberg still crying about not getting in after going 1-6 against the RPI top 50, and nearly...nearly...beating a Final Four team?

I think this a little out of line.  How many years has the ACC been one of the top bid conferences in the tourney ususally.  They have one down year and a well deserved not so good out of conference schedule play and they get "irked".  They had there chance to make a stronger conference with key out of conference wins and they failed.  Take it like a man I say and quit whining because of a down year. IMO the ACC got what they deserved.

 I doubt the big 12 will get 6 in this year again. 

I ilike the Big ten to get atleat 6 in next year however. 

They did have the Top conference RPI all year long.

This has happened more than just a couple of years, a few years back before the expansion, they only had 3 teams in, but then they had 7 one year and they thought everything was back.  But now, its back to four...here's the deal;

The ACC has had a lot of NBA early defections this decade and therefore you have lots of schools that need a couple of years to get back to that Top 40 status you need to be at to get an at-large bid.  There has even been years when Duke and UNC have not made the tournament, thats like hell freezing over. 

The ACC with 12 is 2 and 10 others, the 2 have coaches that can reload evey year and the other 10 are trying treading water, just trying to separate themselves from the pack, and because most put an emphasis on basketball, you dont have any Oregon States or Colorado's in the mix. 

All that and they've been exposed in their non-conference games...