powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Who should be the next GM Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Who should be the next GM


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


Who should be the next GM
-
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Feb 9, 2008

May 18, 2008 2:30 pm
Unless your team is rebuilding, not making the playoffs in a season makes the season a failure.

The fact that after June 1 of 06, they have been a below .500 team is a good reason to say they sucked. They fished with 90 wins in 06 and were a .500 team for the second half of the season, if that’s not a joke, what is?


Who should be the next GM
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 22, 2006

May 19, 2008 2:20 pm

WS1 that's why they play 162 games a year to determine the best team, and whatever you end up with that's determines your position in standings. They were cold in second half of 2006, and would up with 90 wins, good but not good enought doesn't mean they sucked. In 2005 they lost 7 staright in August and I think also in September, so what does that mean that they sucked that yr also. No you take into account the the body of work for the year, which was 99 wins and they still scared the crap out of us sox fans.

If you dont win the series that makes the season a failure to most teams.I'll remind you or you can remind me how bad the White Sox suck this year at the end of the year. Just don't go and hide when they are still in contention in September or worse jump on the bandwagon and start saying I knew they were good and that KW and OG are great.

GO WHITE SOX!!!!!!!