powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
2008 Pac 10 Standings Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Contests
 Fantasy FB Today
 Fantasy News
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 Football Scoreboard
 Football Rankings
 Football Passing Leaders
Football Rushing Leaders
Football Highlights
Volleyball Rankings
MaxPreps High School Sports
MaxPreps TV Schedule
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

2008 Pac 10 Standings


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


2008 Pac 10 Standings
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Apr 9, 2008

June 23, 2008 4:22 pm

kimdaddy35

Is this the article you were talking about? www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewt
opic.php


2008 Pac 10 Standings
-
Reputation:83
Level:All-Star
Since:May 29, 2008

June 25, 2008 2:17 pm

I think the Mountain West could have a break out season with great opportunities for BYU, Utah, New Mexico, and TCU to have solid wins over BCS mid-levelers. By the end of the day on September 13, the Mountain West could have strong wins over: Michigan, UCLA, Washington, Stanford, and Arizona.

There is a very real possibility that the Mountain West finishes with 3 teams in the top 25 in 2008. With BYU's team and Utah's schedule, you could potentially have two top 10 teams!

The Mountain West must capitalize on this season's opportunity! It will be a huge stride in legitimizing the conference and to bring it out of obscurity. It's sad that the fact that the ESPN does not have a deal for TV coverage of MWC games results in sub-par coverage of the conference. But with 3 top 25 teams, they will not be able to ignore!

Is the next step expansion? It may be, but grabbing the right additions would be imperative. Many say Boise State is the next logical step, but I'm not so sure. They have had a great run for the last 4-5 years, but does it have the power to stay? May be not. I don't think the Broncos have the facilities or the market to strengthen the MWC.

I would like to see Fresno State do well. That school has some potential and definitely would be nice to add another school in the California.

I also have high hopes for SMU. Back in the '80's, SMU was a top program. Perhaps June Jones can right that ship. They would make a perfect travel partner for TCU (in basketball and other sports). However, the jury is still out. The SMU boosters have shown that they are committed to developing a quality program (Jones' hiring), but it must be settled on the field, so to speak.

Any other schools to consider in the West?

 


2008 Pac 10 Standings
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Apr 9, 2008

June 26, 2008 3:18 pm

maybe Hawaii but travel sucks

 


2008 Pac 10 Standings
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Apr 27, 2008

July 4, 2008 3:29 pm

I think we could add Nevada if we were really looking for a team. Their location is good and they always seem to have respectable football and basketball teams.

But in reply to the original idea of this thread the only BYU and/or Utah would get into the Pac-10 is if they both had really good seasons for the next couple seasons and not just in football.


2008 Pac 10 Standings
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 25, 2007

July 4, 2008 6:51 pm
Exactly. Utah´s athletic dept.- except gymnastics- is not competitive enough for the Pac-10. Most of us only take football into consideration. But what about other sports? I like the idea of the MWC having a good season and reaching BCS stature. Right now I only see two top-20 finishers this year but some say three.


2008 Pac 10 Standings
-
Reputation:79
Level:Pro
Since:Oct 2, 2006

July 8, 2008 6:51 pm

Jazz/cougs, I think any moron could tell you weren't being serious. Having said that, I think the BYu to the PAC 10 discussion is just getting extremely old. As BYU fans, we've been talking about a potential move to the Pac 10 for 30 years now. I've basically relegated myself to the fact that its not happening. I just thought it was funny that you left out UCLA.

By the way, I'm not sure how my comment was perceived as "holier than thou", but whatever. In all honesty, between my comment and this little private one you sent me, yours is much more "holier than thou". Accusing someone of a holier than thou attitude or comment when it wasn't there is pretty damn holier than thou in my opinion.


2008 Pac 10 Standings
-
Reputation:88
Level:All-Star
Since:Jul 8, 2008

July 9, 2008 5:56 pm

But BYU Backer, isn't it holier than thou to say that his holier than thou comment is holier than thou.  Wait a second, I guess that makes my comment the most holier than thou because I called your post about his holier than thou comment being holier than thou. HAHA!

Go Cougars!


2008 Pac 10 Standings
-
Reputation:79
Level:Pro
Since:Oct 2, 2006

July 10, 2008 3:17 pm
You're exactly right Denver! And now my comment is more holier than thou than your holier than thou comment. Sometimes I think people throw the holier than though comment around far too quick