powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
Crazy How it Got Here Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Contests
 Fantasy FB Today
 Fantasy News
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 Football Scoreboard
 Football Rankings
 Football Passing Leaders
Football Rushing Leaders
Football Highlights
Volleyball Rankings
MaxPreps High School Sports
MaxPreps TV Schedule
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Crazy How it Got Here


View Message Board ·  Return to StoryViews:      


Crazy How it Got Here
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:May 18, 2007

June 18, 2008 10:29 am

I will have to admit that I thought that the Lakers were going to win the series before it started.  I am a Wolves fan, and I really wanted to see KG succeed, but I just didn't think they could do it.  Did the path to the championship confuse the crap out of anyone else?

I hear all of that analysis about how the Celts needed extra time to play together, but come on...  I know that the Pistons and Lakers were better teams than the Hawks and Cavs.  I just really thought they ran out of gas, lost their focus, were smoke'n crack, something...  They weren't good enough to just turn it on when they wanted to, were they??

And then just win so dominantly over two of the best teams in the league.  What's the deal.  I don't believe in conspiracies much, but I thought it was frick'n crazy!

Was it all just them playing defense, having confidence.  They did it twice in the finals too, going down by huge margins early in games 4 & 5, only to win one and have a great shot at winning the other.


Crazy How it Got Here
-
Reputation:91
Level:All-Star
Since:Jun 14, 2008

June 18, 2008 3:35 pm
Here's how it happened.  The Celtics did have one defensive weakness, and it involved playing against athletic teams that could bound explosively to the rim.  They lost regular season games to the Wizards (3 times), the Bobcats, the Nuggets, the Cavs twice, the Magic twice--all teams that had this ability.  The most athletic teams the Celtics played in the playoffs were in order of the rounds they played (i.e, in reverse of what should have been the normal level of difficulty).  The most athletic were the Hawks, then the Cavs, then the Pistons, and the least athletic were the Lakers.  With only Bryant able to penetrate and beat a Celtic off the dribble (others could theoretically have done this but were not consistent), the Celtics were able to be comfortable locking down targets (principally Bryant, Odom and Gasol) whereas they were not able to lock down Joe Johnson or LeBron James or Delonte West as easily.  The reason that Celtics fans who had watched the team all season were much more confident about these Finals than the national observer who watched the Lakers blast through the West was that we could see that the Celtics defense was much better geared toward a station to station team like LA than if we had faced an athletic team like New Orleans (or, for that matter, a grinding, tough team like Utah).