OFFICIAL OSU/USC Trash Talk Thread.......

Buckeyetodd45 USC lost to a 40 point underdog because of injuries and a QB with a broken finger who should of been taken out the game. 4 picks in the 2nd half and a bunch of players who arnt used to playing each other. But that really doesnt matter that was a slip up. You know SC is better than that. Lets talk about a common opponent ILLINIOS. The team you guys couldnt keep of the board with your #1 defense. They were humiliated by a healthy USC team, and you guys couldnt even beat them to get to the national championship.

Now let me tell you where SC is more talented, just about evrywhere.

QB - Beckman is a average QB will manage the game but hes nothing special. Sanchez, Mustain and Corp have more talent than him.

RB - Its not close here benie is good but no gamebreaker, what did he do against LSU? I would take the top 3 runningbacks for SC over Benie. Stafon Johnson, Cj Gable and Joe Mcknight. Not to mention Mark Tyler and Brodrick Green.

WR - I would say even but Ohio St doesnt have a player like Ronald Johnson or Hazlton. Ohio st has two posetion receivers and thats about it. I didnt see the speed at reciever last year.

O Line - Ok you guys might have this one because we lost two first rounders. But its not by much.

D line - USC lost the best DT in the game and were still better here. Did you guys even touch Matt Flynn. Ellis will be a big loss but not so much Jackson, Everson Griffin will be two times better.

LB - Your right Mauluga is a beast and him next to Cush = the best LB corp in the country.

DB - Ohio st has better Corners but not safties so its a tie.

 There you go I think were the more talented team.

norcalgo18:

There is no way you can say you would take 5 USC RB's over Beanie Wells. That is just a ridiculously stupid comment. Beanie Wells might be the best RB is the nation next year. At QB, USC has the advantage. At WR, Ohio State has some playmakers of their own. The Buckeyes will have Robiskie, Hartline, Small, Llamar Thomas, and Posey for next year. With the addition of the new receivers they can definitely run with USC at the WR position. Ohio State will have one of the best O Line's in the nation next year and just had the top class in the nation at that position, so they will be fine. USC's D line might be better because of their depth and speed. Ohio State does have Lawrence Wilson though. Sorry, but Ohio State probably has the best LB corp in the nation now that Laurinaitis returned. Ohio State has better corners they will be first round draft picks.

I would say if you match the first team for Ohio State against the first team of USC, it is pretty close. However, I do agree that the depth of USC at certain positions such as RB, DL will ultimately lead to a USC victory in this game. Also, the major X factor is the fact that Jim Tressel will get outcoached. His style of play will be exposed again. This is why I see USC winning the game by 7-14.

When will you understand? OSU scored a touchdown with 1:13 left, all the players were on the bench and the gatorade was on the coach. All the OSU fans had gone. So you take your 14 pt defeat and set it right in your mind that it wasn't a blowout. It was a 21 point deficit until 1:13 left, sounds like a blowout to me and everyone else that isn't a OSU homer.

I've heard this a million times about OSU's last TD Grish.  It was a 14pt game with 1:50 left to play.  You'd love to be able to throw out the last TD for OSU because it helps you believe it was a blowout, but the reality is it was a 14pt win in which OSU had more yards of offense.  Talk about homerism.  LSU only domintated ONE quarter.

1st quarter= OSU 10, LSU 3

2nd quarter=OSU 0, LSU 21

3rd quarter=OSU 7, LSU 7

4th quarter=OSU 7, LSU 7

So if LSU "dominated" and was SOOOO much better than why didn't they dominate the whole game as you suggest?  How did the inferior Ohio State take a 10-0 lead to start the game?  How did LSU only manage to score 7 pts from the start of the 2nd half until 1:50 left in the game?  If LSU "dominated" the WHOLE game then why did they only outscore OSU in ONE quarter? 

My best guess is that you and your cronies talked so much trash about how LSU would "blowout" OSU, that you don't care about the fact that it was a 14pt win and OSU had more yards of offense.  So if it makes you feel more justified then by all means keep calling it a "blowout" win.  Just don't be caught telling someone else that a 14pt LSU loss someday isn't a blowout.

BuckeyeTodd - did you watch the game?  I mean I know it was painful but did you really sit down and watch it?  OSU was dominated in 3 of the 4 quarters of the NC game.  It would have been 21 pts if LSU didn't let in an easy TD for OSU at the end of the game.  Just like OSU dominated the Michigan game.  The score didn't really dictate that but by watching the game you seen that OSU completely controlled that game.  The same is true about what LSU did to OSU. 

See this is the kind of logic you get:

"Well the score and stats didn't really indicate how much of a "domination" it was, but it really was."  "I mean LSU only outscored OSU in one quarter, but yet they "dominated" the two that they didn't outscore them in, because stats and pts mean nothing".

Do you even realize how stupid that sounds?  So if the yards of production and pts don't really tell the story, then what does?  You're homeristic goggles?  What a freaking dope.

So by your standards then OSU "dominated" Notre Shame in the 2005 Fiesta Bowl right Irish?  You can't have it both ways so you HAVE to agree right?

Just like Todd, you need to put down the glue.  OSU was dominated in the NC game from the 2nd quarter till the final whistle.  Only a OSU homer would say otherwise.  Again did you watch the game?  Or just look at the score?

Here's the exact logic Notre Shame poster uses:

In the third quarter both teams scored 7pts but LSU "dominated".

In the fourth quarter NEITHER team scored until 1:50 left in the game and then they both scored twice, but LSU "dominated" the quarter. 

Again domination didn't play itself out in stats or pts, but it's still domination right?

LSU "dominated" the second quarter.  That was the difference in the game.

doesnt matter both of you arguing who dominated who.

tenn. was up on lsu for 3 quarters and they came back and won lsu beat osu dont have to dominate them

Either way maestro, tonight while you are eating dinner, just remember that i will be enjoying gulf shrimp, crabs, hush puppies and crawfish. Gotta love New Orleans.

You said you'll be enjoying crabs.  I mean HAVING crabs is bad enough, but to say you enjoy them is just wrong man.

I better be careful.  Don't want wittle Mikey running to CBS and warning me like the little girl he is.  What a putz.

There is no way you can say you would take 5 USC RB's over Beanie Wells. That is just a ridiculously stupid comment. Beanie Wells might be the best RB is the nation next year. At QB, USC has the advantage. At WR, Ohio State has some playmakers of their own. The Buckeyes will have Robiskie, Hartline, Small, Llamar Thomas, and Posey for next year. With the addition of the new receivers they can definitely run with USC at the WR position. Ohio State will have one of the best O Line's in the nation next year and just had the top class in the nation at that position, so they will be fine. USC's D line might be better because of their depth and speed. Ohio State does have Lawrence Wilson though. Sorry, but Ohio State probably has the best LB corp in the nation now that Laurinaitis returned. Ohio State has better corners they will be first round draft picks.

I didnt say that I would take 5 I said I would take the top 3 Cj Gable, Stafon Johnson, and Joe Mcknight. Then I put Mark Tyler and Brodrick Green in there just to show off more depth. All I have seen for Ohio St at the WR position is Hartline and Robiskie, both good recievers. The Question wasnt if they could run with SC it was who is the more talented bunch and they dont match up to Turner, Hazleton, Johnson, Asberry and the Arkansas transfer Johnson. As far as the O line goes they might have the upper edge and if they do its not by much at all. I disagree with them signing the best O line class, I think that went to USC also. And sorry but SC has the best LB corp in football. Laurinitas = 1, Mauluga and Cushing = 2.

I can actually hear a tear falling from wittle Mikey's cheak.  "You guys suck.  Mommy, cassells made me look dumb on the message boards."  "Well then you go report him to CBS and try and get him kicked off.  Nobody makes fun of my wittle Mikey Wikey.  Now run inside and get ready for some yummy Shrimp Gumbo".