|
wow, I guess the name Al Davis throws everyone into a tizzy.
No, not a Raiders fan or an Al Davis fan. Just a fan of the truth. The reason Shanahan was fired was 7-9 & 1-3. He may have gotten a few more games in '89 if he hadn't previously coached for Denver or San Francisco. Davis is biased in that way.
In any event, Shanahan's problem is fairly common: you can't be a great coach and GM at the same time. Take Joe Gibbs as an example. Great coach with Bobby Beathard as GM. Not so great, at either, when doing both.
I don't profess to be a psychologist, but I think there is more incentive to pour your heart out on the field for a guy you trust. The "game" stays a "game" and isn't a business between the white lines. When the same words "atta boy" and "you're cut/traded" come out of the same mouth, it's hard to be loyal to that voice. When a coach is a coach, he can always blame the GM for cuts and trades, and the coach can stay on the player's side, and the players will play harder for someone they trust.
Shanahan hasn't focused on coaching in a long time. He's the face of the Broncos when it comes to these personnel decisions. Players will always side with players, and who wants to play for a di?k that will cut you because you're late for a meeting. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but I believe alot of players think that way. It was easy for Shanahan to act that way on the heels of 2 super bowl wins because players would say "I don't care if he's a di?k, if he get me my ring." He's too far away from that now. If he wants to be a great coach, be a great coach and get the most out of players by motivating them. Don't be a good coach and a bad/untrustworthy GM.
Bottom line; he's not a great coach.
|