Red socks a Dynasty???

HAHA get serious. I love all of the Red Sock fans saying the Yankees are done and its Bostons turn now. To be a Dynasty you need to sustain a long period of success. Like 4 titles in 5 season or 9 straight division titles neither which boston has done. Boston missed the playoffs in 2006 winning only 86 games and finished 3rd in the division. The last time the Yanks finished worse than 2nd was 1992. Sorry D Rays fans, don't get your hopes up.

The Yanks are coming around and will be right in the middle of the excitement come seasons end and will be in the playoffs...AGAIN.

Yanks are a dynasty, Boston is not.

why do fans always talk about what they did 10 or 20 years ago? yall might have been back then, but nothing close now. In this time period we are much more of a dynasty than yall. Quit living in the past.

P.S.
/page/BOS">Red Sox's win Tuesday. (Getty Images)" src="http://images.sportsline.com/u/phot
os/baseball/mlb/img10767880.jpg" width="320" />
i want to see A-rod' in a picture like this

kwilliams -

You say Yanks are a dynasty? Agreed, the Yanks were once a dynasty but are not anymore.  Simply put, the Sox are much closer to being a dynasty than the Yanks.  Since you bring up division titles, then obviously the Braves must have been one also.  What 13 division titles? Ask their fans how much they enjoy having 1 WS in that same 13 years or if they think they were a dynasty.  If not, you can throw away your 9 division titles.

SeanAvery -

You really aren't worth the time but I will digress....what is your definition of a foundation?  Maybe 4 Stanley cups in 80 years for the Rangers while the Islanders won 4 in their first 15 years....man those 1940 chants were great back in the day.  Or how about them Knicks 1972 was awesome wasn't it.  Since you are such the expert on dynasties, why don't you enlighten all of us as to what a good foundation is?