|
I wrote: "... except that before 2002, the Pac-10 regularly had 2 or even 3 teams in the final Top 10.
&
Cal !!! That's IT since 2003.
So like I said, before the rise of USC (2002) this decade, the Pac-10 had 3 and 2 Top 10 teams, and after, the Pac-10 has supplied ONE non-USC team in the Top 10.
And they still have had about two teams every year in the poll since 2002...right? Just because one of them has been USC doesn't change the dynamics of the situation. I know you are trying to spin this to say that the league hasn't been competitive since 2002, but the fact that every year since then at least one other PAC 10 team has been ranked in the final polls... and just because it is #12 or #14 instead of #10 really makes little difference in the grand scheme of things, regardless of the B.S. spin you are trying to put on this.
Furthermore, stats can be spun in a number of different ways as we all well know and you can pull whatever data out of those stats that I provided from 1992-2001 you want to in order to try to make your point, such as pointing out only the numbers from 2000-01, but when you step back and look at the big picture, you said they usually had 2-3 teams each year before 2002.... but the fact of the matter is that 6 of those 10 years the PAC 10 only had one team or less in the final top 10 and only one of those years did they have 3 teams. Now that might not be most of the time, but it is a majority of the time.... and it is a far cry from what you said really happened.
Bottom line here sir, my reading skills may have very well diminished some.... but one thing is for certain, your B.S. spinning is still going full speed ahead.
|
