powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
Your Starters Play Too Many Minutes Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Contests
 Fantasy FB Today
 Fantasy News
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 Football Scoreboard
 Football Rankings
 Football Passing Leaders
Football Rushing Leaders
Football Highlights
Volleyball Rankings
MaxPreps High School Sports
MaxPreps TV Schedule
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Your Starters Play Too Many Minutes


View Message BoardViews:      


Your Starters Play Too Many Minutes
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 2, 2007

July 4, 2008 6:42 pm
It seems as though when fans are upset about their teams the first thing they complain about is the bench not being used enough.  Pistons fans did this last year, , Celtics fans did it this year.  Spurs fans noted how every other team played their starters too much and the bench not enough. 

There is somewhat of a point to this--if your star is 30 years old or over, you probably don't want him playing over 40 MPG on a consistent basis (unless it's Allen Iverson).  But it was sort of funny seeing people make a big deal about something like 33 vs. 35 MPG.  Particularly since the MPG stat is a little distorted.  For instance, if your own team gets blown out early, the starters get to rest.  Is that good?  I would look at total minutes over the overpopular MPG stat. 

But then, consider the Pistons, Celtics, Spurs examples.  For the Pistons, it didn't seem like moving Billups from 36 to 31 MPG really did much for the team.  For a professional basketball player who's in good shape and is still in his prime, those 5 extra minutes per game really don't make much a of a difference come playoff time.  You get to the playoffs and adrenaline takes over, unless you are hurt or extremely worn out.  The MPG stuff really only matters for very old or not so durable or out of shape or fading players. 

Then you have the Celtics, and Rivers was chided for playing his starters too much during the regular season, and they did get a little banged up in the playoffs.  But adrenaline took over and the team won the big one.  Talent and chemistry are a lot more important than minutes per game. 

Finally, the Spurs, whose fans relish the fact that Popovich keeps the starters' minutes down.  But with Pop, I feel it's more about developing the bench than holding back the starters a minute or more per game.  You'll notice that he won't hesitate to use Duncan or Parker 40+ minutes if the Spurs are locked in a tight battle, regular season or playoffs.  It doesn't seem to be about the MPG number for Popovich, but more about developing the bench when heavy minutes for the stars are unnecesary. 

The point is, play your bench to develop your bench, not so that you can boast about how your starters got under 35 MPG.  That's just an artificial dividing line, as it is.  The only time you really have to watch MPG numbers is if you are relying heavily on a player who is old AND encountering physical problems--someone like Shaq, Nash (the Suns in general), Ilgauskas, maybe Kidd.  But the general rule is to develop your bench for the sake of developing your bench--as a fan, having your starters play 31 as opposed to 35 MPG is not really something to boast about...and I think recent examples have established this fact. 

Your Starters Play Too Many Minutes
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 2, 2007

July 4, 2008 6:43 pm
-brought this up only because this is a stat a lot of posters really liked to talk about, especially early on in the regular season. 

Your Starters Play Too Many Minutes
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 29, 2007

July 4, 2008 8:26 pm

"Then you have the Celtics, and Rivers was chided for playing his starters too much during the regular season, and they did get a little banged up in the playoffs.  But adrenaline took over and the team won the big one.  Talent and chemistry are a lot more important than minutes per game. "

Don't want to spend too much time on this but, the Celtics "big three" minutes were around 38.5 between them in the first three months of the seasons.  The last two months around 31.  Do you think that was so they would be rested?


Your Starters Play Too Many Minutes
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 2, 2007

July 5, 2008 2:19 pm
Do you think that was so they would be rested?

Well, part of it was injuries, I believe.  Also, the season for the Celtics effectively ended early, so at that point, you might as well get some minutes for your deep subs and get them ready for the playoffs. 

Your Starters Play Too Many Minutes
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 29, 2007

July 5, 2008 6:39 pm
two months?  No, your deep subs don't play inthe playoffs.  Fact is, the coaches seem to disagree with you, lowering minutes does in their eyes help.  I am not sure I agree with them, I like the way San Antonio seems to do it, wherein they coast for most of the season but then ramp up a month before the playoffs. 

Your Starters Play Too Many Minutes
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 2, 2007

July 5, 2008 6:50 pm
But does 35/36 vs. 33 minutes really make a difference?  You follow the Pistons do you not?  (Sorry if I confused your team, I thought youw ere a Pistons fan).  Did following Dumars' strategy and lowering Chauncey's minutes make a big difference?  Would the Pistons have fared significantly worse if Chancey played 2006/2007 minutes? 

Your Starters Play Too Many Minutes
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 29, 2007

July 6, 2008 12:36 am
Hard to say due to Chauncey's injury, but I would agree that prince ran out of gas anyways(just took