powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Rangers Projections in 2008 Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Rangers Projections in 2008


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


Rangers Projections in 2008
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 14, 2007

January 5, 2008 1:49 pm
I hope they do better than .500 I feel they have the pieces in place to contend.If they can land a starting pitcher and Millwood and Padilla win 32 games I think they can end up 91-71. I think we are going to be pleasantly surprised this year.

Rangers Projections in 2008
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 15, 2007

January 5, 2008 6:01 pm
You 2 have lost your minds if you think the Rangers will contend this year. They are light years behind the Angels, Tigers, Indians, Red Sox and Yankees. I could see them finishing 2nd in the West but Seattle is probably a better team right now. Oakland has likely traded themselves to the back of the division. In fact the one thing I say the Rangers need to make sure of this year is that they dont finish last in the West. If they end up behind the As there is a serious problem.

Rangers Projections in 2008
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 14, 2007

January 5, 2008 6:39 pm
They are light years behind the Angels, Tigers, Indians, Red Sox, and Yankees.

Only in pitching now after this offseason. Stranger things have happened.

You 2 have lost your minds

Mr. ATDel this is the best part of the season. Everyone has a chance. Don't be disillusioned by years past. Did you think the 2006 Tigers had a chance? Did you think the 2007 Rockies had a chance? Come on, think positive!!! You are too young to be so negative... Here to the 2008 Rangers!!! Let go Rangers!!!

Cheers-


Rangers Projections in 2008
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 15, 2007

January 5, 2008 6:57 pm
Im very happy about what they have done to make this team better for years to come so its not about being negative. I just know too much about the game of baseball to even think the Rangers are a contender this year. Obviously there are always surprises but be realistic. And they are just as far behind those teams I listed in offense as they are in pitching. We have a total of 0 established power hitters in the lineup. I guess we could call Blalock 1 but he still needs to prove he can come back form his injuries. We have a few guys with the potential to be that kind of hitter but they have to prove they can produce before I will give them the label of power hitter. We dont have anywhere near the lineups of any of those teams. The Angels are the only one we come close to comparing to.

Rangers Projections in 2008
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 14, 2007

January 5, 2008 7:52 pm

Mr ATDel,

I am playing with you just a little bit but, I am also being very honest about some things. Hitting HR's does not make you a winner.

Who hit the most HR's last year in the AL?

Yankees 201. Did they win their league? No. They had the 4th best record in the AL. Good? Yes, but they should be good for all the money they spend. Great infield. Great outfield. Underacheivers. Enough about the Yankees.

Red Sox hit 166. Infield so-so. Lugo, Lowell, Pedroia, and Youk. Rangers are better if they stay healthy. Crisp, Drew, and Ramirez. I think it's a push with Byrd, Hamilton and Bradley.

Indians 178. I think we have a better infield and outfield after this offseason.

Tigers 177 last year. I will reserve comment because it will be apples and ornges after their moves. Caberra is a stud. Big upgrade from Inge.

Angels 123. They have a better outfield I give you that. The Rangers have a better infield.

Rangers 179. What??? More than any of these other teams but the Yankees.

No power hitters? I don't think so. Well established. Well that just means they are almost over the hill.

BTW the Rangers are better with Hamilton than with Hunter....


Rangers Projections in 2008
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 15, 2007

January 5, 2008 8:43 pm

I didnt realize those teams were lower in HRs....good info. Look at the run totals though, all but Cleveland scored more runs. And Detroit as you mentioned above improved greatly on offense with Cabrera. Also remember Sosa is now gone and he led the team last year. Also the stats that Teixeira put up are a part of the Rangers team numbers. Hamilton should do right around what Sosa did last year, maybe better but that would be a good year for him. Also keep in mind Byrd and Murphy will more then likely not be quite what they were last year. I bring up the lack of power hitters because when you play half your games in a launching pad you need to have guys that can take advantage of it. We suffer from our park on the defensive end and cant take andvantage from the offensive side. There are 2 major holes that keep our lineup from being what those other teams are. First is a legit clean-up guy. We have 2 guys in Blalock and Bradley that could be good in that spot but both have huge ? I dont want Hamilton there because in my mind he is our best hitter so I want him batting 3 so he can have some protection. Young spends alot of time in the 3 hole but I really dont like him there. He just doesnt have the power to be a middle of the order guy. He is perfect in the 2 spot though so thats where I like him. The 2nd glaring hole is that we have nothing near a true leadoff hitter. The Reds used Hamilton as leadoff at times but like I said he's the best hitter so we cant waste him at leadoff.


Rangers Projections in 2008
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 14, 2007

January 5, 2008 9:26 pm
Totally agree. Leadoff is the glaring hole. Let me think about this for a second and I will get back to you. That 1,4, & 7 are real questions and I need to think about... 1 is the biggest problem... 4 is a stop gap... 7 is big too... I like Murphy at 1 when he starts. I like Shelton at 7 when he starts. I like Byrd at 5... lots of doubles...

Rangers Projections in 2008
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 25, 2007

April 9, 2008 7:03 am
The problem with the Rangers is the same problem that they have had for the 20-25 years. Pitching.


Rangers Projections in 2008
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 13, 2007

January 6, 2008 12:05 am