powered by Google  
CBSSports.com Is NBA officiating bad? You're (expletive) right it is - NBA Sports News   Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Contests
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
NBA Home | Scoreboard | Standings | Schedules | Stats | Teams | Players | Transactions | Injuries | Video | Fantasy News
 

Is NBA officiating bad? You're (expletive) right it is

 

It is difficult to quote Rasheed Wallace as an expert on anything except high-grade idiocy and foul-mouthed lunacy.

Normally that's the case, particularly when it comes to NBA officials. Wallace and refs get along like Scott McClellan and George W. Bush. In Game 5 against Boston, Wallace received his sixth technical foul of the postseason, meaning one more and Wallace will receive an automatic one-game suspension.

Is isn't just Wallace's opinion. What constitutes a foul keeps changing, Freeman says. (Getty Images)  
Is isn't just Wallace's opinion. What constitutes a foul keeps changing, Freeman says. (Getty Images)  
Afterward, Mt. Wallace erupted in what was a bitter rant sure to get him heavily fined.

"All that (expletive) calls they had out there, with Mike (Callahan) and Kenny (Mauer) you've all seen that (expletive)," Wallace said. "You saw them calls. The cats are flopping all over the floor and they're calling that (expletive). That (expletive) ain't basketball out there. It's all (expletive) entertainment. You all should know that (expletive). It's all (expletive) entertainment."

Just in case you didn't get that, it's all expletive entertainment.

Fine. Wallace is a hothead. That's not news.

What is news is that Wallace is correct.

His methodology might be expletived, but his general assertion is not wrong.

This isn't solely about the Boston-Detroit series; this is about the state of game officiating in the NBA in general right now.

The officiating in this postseason has been some of the worst I have seen in many years of covering professional basketball.

It's not just officials failing to call a foul in Game 4 of the Western Conference finals. (The league later admitted the mistake). Perhaps the worst-officiated game of the year was Game 4 of the East finals. In that game, officials made a concerted, obvious effort to insert themselves into the flow. There were an incredible 65 combined free throw attempts (39-26 in favor of the Celtics) on 58 foul calls.

The game illustrated what continues to be a glaring problem in basketball: the lack of consistency of what is a foul. It changes not just game to game, but sometimes quarter to quarter.

"Our guys kept their composure through things, and I think we were in a situation -- yeah, there were some questionable calls, but I told our guys no matter what, we had to keep our aggressiveness," Detroit coach Flip Saunders said following Game 4. "That's how we play. I thought the game was called a lot differently tonight than the previous -- how many games have we played in the playoffs, the previous 15 games or whatever it was. I thought tonight there was a lot more ticky-tack stuff called, both areas, than there was in the previous games we had played."

CONTINUED: 1 · 2 · Next »
 
Talk Back
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 22, 2006

May 29, 2008 3:22 pm
First off, let me preface this thread by saying it is my belief the refs must get better at being more consistent and effecient with their craft.  This is their profession and they should exact a level of expertise at this level.  Now that I said that, I would challenge anyone who thinks the refs suck to actually try officiating  even a competitive youth league THEN get back to your ...(more)
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 10, 2008

May 29, 2008 1:44 pm
Outside of the flopping issue, it's not that bad.  Players start learning in high school the art of overreacting to contact to fool an offiicial.  We live in an instant replay, super slow mo HD era that would make any ref look bad no matter how skilled and trained.  Either we accept the human factor of calling fouls and other malfunctions, or this controversy will continue to get wo ...(more)
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 16, 2006

May 29, 2008 3:13 pm
Now this flopping has been a major issue of complaining for A LOT OF TEAMS (I've heard many of fans left and right moaning about it) but when it goes their way "its a part of the game" I am not that way... I want it gone. Refs know what a foul is (sorry Laker fans Barry would be shooting 2 FT's to at least have a chance to tie it up) because that was a foul... but "if he sold it&quo ...(more)
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 14, 2006

May 29, 2008 2:20 pm
As blunt and straight forward as head always is, hes typically right on things such as this.  Hes a very smart person its just that hes so emotional its hard to take him serious.  I honestly dont care bc i think Detroit will still win this series.  Backs are surely against the wall now just the way they like it.
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 8, 2007